< Back

Pre Thesis project

Community Networks

Community Networks

Introduction

CoWHki - Community Owned Wireless Health Knowledge Infrastructure -- is one such community experimenting with different models of owning and organising a network. It's a collective of Community Frontline Health Workers (referred to as Health Navigators - HN's in the project ) and individual practitioners who are working towards imagining an embryonic form of the internet where people rule. We practice bottom-up, situated long-term engagement with communities driven by gradual trust building through transparency and participation in each step of design and development.

CoWHki - offers a space to interact, build, develop, shape, learn and unlearn with different complexly intertwined digital, physical and social infrastructures in play within and around the network, often by challenging the status quo of human centeredness of design. It will help students to understand both benefits and challenges of collective and autonomous practices of design, in other words, the praxis of independence.

Methodology

Participatory Design | Co - Creating

Theme

Documentation | Inclusivity

How did we investigate a space without
having prior knowledge about the community?

Planning visits

Each visit should have an agenda as to why we are visiting the space and what are we trying to accomplish

Co - Designing Activities (with HN's)

To understand the workings of the space, we need to engage with the workers of the community through activities designed with a certain intent. We asked them about their job and through that we were able to map certain points of intervention

Freedom to experiment

Making sure that the space we are creating is not an imposition but an explorative way for them to give us information

Analysis

After gaining the information, reflecting back on it and building activities from that point

Points of intervention

Through our visits and conversations we were able to identify certain themes

Moment of Realisation

The community operates on two values - Trust and Influence. The bond that these ladies have created through their work in the community has put them in a position where they are in a position to influence the community with valuable advice, in terms of their health.

How did I uncover this ?

Shadowing HN's

To understand what they do, how they operate, we as a group decided to shadow them when they interacted with the community

Observations

Observing the process of uploading the content that they put up on the portal and figure out how they use the content and for what reasons

Content Prioritisation

While uploading the content or even while collecting the information, what type of information is prioritised, why is that decision made etc.

Day in the life of a Field Coordinator

Observe the kind of decisions that are made by her to understand the "governing" part of the organisation

Interviewing/ Conversations with the members of the organisation

Through multiple conversations, micro-interactions and interviews, extracting the minute details that might get missed through the activities that are conducted

Shadowing HN's

To understand what they do, how they operate, we as a group decided to shadow them when they interacted with the community( the images shown below are annotated notes that were made after the visits)

Going in with questions

Before reaching the site, we had set up a few questions in our minds to answer while we observe what she does and she does it

Recording the interaction

Recording the interaction

Recording the interaction

Before we started recording, we had asked for consent from all parties present in the space, this was done so we respected the people present and also for us to look back the conversation and touch on the points of intervention

Observing the interaction (from the Client's view)

Noticing the minute details of the participation from the clients side

Advice that the members give to the clients

Advice that the members give to the clients

Advice that the members give to the clients

Making a note of what kind of advice was given and why certain topics were not touched upon

Observations

This activity helped us understand the pros and cons of the process of uploading the content on their
portal (PAPAD), it helped us map down the points of intervention, the information that we can use
to create an asset for them, any improvements that we can make in this process etc.

The notebook

The members of the organisations carry anotebook around and note down their interactions with the clients, get it back to base and then filter out the information to upload on PAPAD

Observation

Observation

Observation

Observing the steps they take to upload the information and helping them with translation and typing, if required

Working as a group

While uploading the content, the entire group sits and helps one another in this process

Annotation

Annotation

Annotation

A closer look on the screen, the member is adding tags to the description so that when some other member of the organisation looks up those tags, they can find similar cases to the ones they have interacted with

Day in the life of Ramakka

This particular activity was planned to understand the decision-making process and
the fields of intervention which are taken hold by the field coordinator.

Step 1

We wrote down a bunch of categories (Materialisation of the idea, Onboarding of members, Organisation of ideas, Practices and Protocol Development, Public Engagement, Motivation and value drive) that we thought would apply in the case of the coordinator. So, when one of us was having a conversation with her - the other two were making notes and recording the conversation for future reference

Step 2

After asking the coordinator multiple questions, we wanted to map down the answers we received, most of which were related to the stakeholders and how they came to being.

The stakeholder relationship was something that we focused on to understand exactly who plays what role and what reasons. We also mapped down the communication systems and the funding systems that take place.

Content Prioritisation

While uploading the content or even while collecting the information, what type of information
is prioritised, why is that decision made etc. the categories that we offered were:

Focus Point

Food Knowledge -
I decided to create a physical artefact (hand book) with the food recipes they share in
the community.

Pain Point

Currently, there is no documentation of the knowledge that they possess and they are working
on uploading these materials on the portal - PAPAD and by creating these physical artefacts
they can further use it as a template to modify these artefacts. The HN's are loaded with
information on home remedies and since this community doesn't have access to the
fast and growing world of technology and adequate resources - the community depends
on the HN's for their health concerns.

Currently, there is no documentation of the knowledge that they possess and they are working
on uploading these materials on the portal - PAPAD and by creating these physical artefacts
they can further use it as a template to modify these artefacts. The HN's are loaded with
information on home remedies and since this community doesn't have access to the
fast and growing world of technology and adequate resources - the community depends
on the HN's for their health concerns.

How does it help?

The artefact is supported with visual elements for the community to read and refer to every time the HN's mention a remedy for their health

How does the entire team access this information?

These recipes are uploaded on the portal - PAPAD as well for the HN's to have a digital copy of the recipes, to share with their clients

Why is it needed?

Currently, they were just keeping everything in conversations by creating an artefact out of it, they can pass it onto the next generations of the HN's.

The pictures of the artefact haven't been uploaded since we were not able to get their consent.